Signal Hill is an advocate for human rights that provides information on life issues, women's health and family support.
The Right to Know
The Research
The Statistics
The Estrogen Factor
Number of Additional Breast Cancer Cases
It is an undeniable, scientific fact that pregnancy affects the breast tissue and aborting a pregnancy denies the woman the long-term protective effect of her full-term pregnancy. Pregnant women who are considering an abortion need to know that they elevate their risk of breast cancer if they choose abortion over childbirth.
Related Links
Abortion in Canada
An excellent source of information on abortion.
abortionincanada.ca
Abortion Breast Cancer
abortionbreastcancer.ca
Abortion Risks
A clearing house for post abortion research and information.
abortionrisks.com
For Post Abortion Help
Optionline
OptionLine.org
Rachel's Vineyard Retreats
RachelsVineyard.org
Abortion Changes You
Stories of people who have experienced abortion
abortionchangesyou.com
Stand up Girl
A site for young women struggling with unplanned pregnancy & abortion
standupgirl.com
Abortion Recovery
A web-site for women and men dealing with abortion
abortionrecovery.org
The Silent No More Awareness Campaign
A Campaign to reach out to people hurt by abortion and to make the public aware that abortion is harmful.
silentnomoreawareness.org
Breast Cancer
There is a large body of evidence supporting the finding that a decision to terminate a pregnancy significantly increases a womans risk of breast cancer. It is an undeniable, scientific fact that pregnancy affects the breast tissue and aborting a pregnancy denies the woman the long-term protective effect of her full-term pregnancy. Pregnant women who are considering an abortion need to know that they elevate their risk of breast cancer if they choose abortion over childbirth.
The Right to Know
The concept of informed consent is fundamental in Canadian medical practice. Regardless of how futile or relevant a particular procedure is in the eyes of the doctor, it is ultimately the patient who will decide to accept or refuse a treatment. The right to informed consent is rendered meaningless if the patient is not given sufficient information. Thus there is a legal obligation placed on doctors to provide all of the material information in order for their patients to make an informed choice. It is now well established that failure to disclose information may result in a finding of negligence against a doctor.
In the Supreme Court Decision in Reibl v. Hughes (1980), Chief Justice Laskin wrote "
even if a certain risk is a mere possibility which ordinarily need not be disclosed, yet if its occurrence carries serious consequences, it should be regarded as a material risk requiring disclosure". The Chief Justice actually rejected the original professional disclosure standard in his decision, making the amount of information to be disclosed to patients much greater than what the medical profession had previously observed.
In Canada, the patients right to self-determination is the source of the doctors duty to disclose material information. However, this standard is not being met within the community of doctors and health care professionals who are working in womens reproductive health. Women are not being informed about the numerous studies showing a statistically significant link between abortion and breast cancer, information that may have serious bearings on their decision to carry through with an abortion.
This is a violation of a womans right to know.